@HillaryClinton vs. @realDonaldTrump
If like me, you’ve browsed the Twitter feeds of the presidential candidates (and have since been cursed with a constant itch to look), you know that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump tweet differently.
Clinton’s feed looks a lot like what you expect from a presidential candidate, whereas Trump’s feed feels more like a mix of things. I mean, well, do I really have to explain? You know what they’re like. If you don’t look at Twitter, just imagine a more succinct, 140-characters-at-a-time version of what you saw in the debates.
So I wondered if you could see the differences between Clinton and Trump with a simple word breakdown of their tweets. I grabbed the tweets available — ones between June 3 and October 17 of this year — and took a look. Here are the results.
In the chart above shows the words most unique to each candidate. They are ordered by uniqueness, and bars represent the rate the words were used during the time period. Clinton often refers to Trump, but doesn’t use his Twitter handle, and she often retweets others such as @timkaine, @potus, and @flotus. Trump tends to informally retweet with quotes, which is why his screen name is towards the top of his list.
Towards the middle of each list, you see the topics each candidate tends to talk about. I like how the percentage sign for poll results pops up on Trump’s side.
If you look at the adjectives, you get a pretty good idea of the vibe of each campaign. Notice the different horizontal axes. Trump uses way more adjectives in his tweets.
But maybe we don’t have to look at the words at all. Maybe we can look just at punctuation. The marks are sorted by more unique to Trump to more unique to Clinton, top to bottom. Trump uses the exclamation point about 35 times more than Clinton. Clinton’s punctuation usage doesn’t stand out so much, other than that she uses more ellipses to tweet quotes.
Become a member. Learn to visualize data. From beginner to advanced.Join Today
This is for people interested in the process of creating, designing, and exploring data graphics. Your support goes directly to FlowingData, an independently run site.
What You Get
- Instant access to tutorials on how to make and design data graphics
- Source code and files to use with your own data
- In-depth courses on visualization in R
- Hand-picked links and resources from around the web
- Members-only newsletter
Data, R, and a 3-D Printer
We almost always look at data through a screen. It’s quick and good for exploration. So is there value in making data physical? I played around with a 3-D printer to find out.
The Stages of Relationships, Distributed
Everyone’s relationship timeline is a little different. This animation plays out real-life paths to marriage.
Reviving the Statistical Atlas of the United States with New Data
Due to budget cuts, there is no plan for an updated atlas. So I recreated the original 1870 Atlas using today’s publicly available data.