xkcd: Cost of everything

Posted to Infographics  |  Tags: ,  |  Nathan Yau

Randall Munroe of xkcd charts the things that money pays for, from the item off the dollar menu all the way up to the total estimated economic productivity of the human race. Following the same scheme to show relative scales that he used for his radiation chart, you get a big picture, a zoom for another big picture, and so on.

For example, here’s the transition from millions to thousands of dollars:

See the graphic in its mondo format here, and see the list of over 200 sources here. So simple, but executed with rigor.

[xkcd]

8 Comments

  • Saw it this morning and found it extremely confusing. I like the idea a lot I find it difficult to get a real feeling of scale from it. It’s also hard to read because the data is not sorted in a lineal way, my eye keeps jumping from thing to thing.

  • It’s not cool. It’s a masterpiece. The difficulty was to render a very huge quantity of information on a single graphic.

    Squares are one of the simplest symbolization that exist and it helps understand scale. Despite the repetitive square figure, he managed to make this graphic not monotone by playing with the squares in different manners: bar graphs, sort of line chart, tree map, even geographic map.

    Within each category, he managed to arrange sub-graphics by topic. We can compare the costs of a millon category item with a thousand category item and wonder if the difference seems justified, and compare items inside oen, category too: example of domestic animal ownership

    The fractal dimension of the representation makes it really esthetic, profound and easy to read (accessible to everyone). Moreover, as fractals are the basis of nature, it can question the society about the links between nature and economics. It makes it sort of universal.

  • Pure xkcd. If you get it, or have the patience to figure it out, it’s brilliant. And it couldn’t care less whether you get it or not.

  • cheeeseburger November 22, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    I find myself wishing I could blow it up, hang it on a big wall, and study it for a few days. xkcd can be exceptionally insightful and hilarious — I bet there are many gems hidden in this graphic.

  • Really nice. I was actually thinking on playing a bit with this concept… what would be the best way to do something like that? R? Python and SVG? Any hints?

  • Initial impact is cool, then you look at the details and realize it’s full of errors.

    I went to xkcd’s web site to report a few of these, and there are literally pages of comments documenting the mistakes. These are not differences of opinion, the are hard, factual errors. (Mis-labeled corporations, wrong numbers, wrong number of boxes (or shading).

    Nice first attempt, but I’d wait for “revision 2” before I shell out $15 for the printed poster.

Favorites

The Changing American Diet

See what we ate on an average day, for the past several decades.

Years You Have Left to Live, Probably

The individual data points of life are much less predictable than the average. Here’s a simulation that shows you how much time is left on the clock.

A Day in the Life of Americans

I wanted to see how daily patterns emerge at the individual level and how a person’s entire day plays out. So I simulated 1,000 of them.

The Best Data Visualization Projects of 2014

It’s always tough to pick my favorite visualization projects. Nevertheless, I gave it a go.