From the Winnipeg Sun. Something isn’t right here. [via]
I see the problem. Looks like the “no” wedge is really on showing 26%. Rookie mistake.
I’d have thought Benoce’s halftime show would be more popular.
73% of respondents think Yes – that “What” was the best part of the Superbowl.
First, no pie chart is amazing. Second, no graph depicting a single number is amazing. With that said, it is humorous in that the title is obviously wrong.
Here are some quality contributions from our top paper in Melbourne, Australia
https://i.imgur.com/K5yfmCn.jpg https://i.imgur.com/w4GIYtZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4XMQKnz.jpg
*laughs, then cries*
This made me chuckle, but Erik Jacobsen’s spot on identification of the problem made me laugh out loud.
Become a member. Learn to visualize your data. From beginner to advanced.
What you get
Some jobs tend towards higher divorce rates. Some towards lower. Salary also probably plays a role.
Before you dive into the advanced stuff – like just about everything in your life – you have to learn the fundamentals before you know when you can break the rules.
I simulated a day for employed Americans to see when and where they work.
The individual data points of life are much less predictable than the average. Here’s a simulation that shows you how much time is left on the clock.
I see the problem. Looks like the “no” wedge is really on showing 26%. Rookie mistake.
I’d have thought Benoce’s halftime show would be more popular.
73% of respondents think Yes – that “What” was the best part of the Superbowl.
First, no pie chart is amazing. Second, no graph depicting a single number is amazing. With that said, it is humorous in that the title is obviously wrong.
Here are some quality contributions from our top paper in Melbourne, Australia
https://i.imgur.com/K5yfmCn.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/w4GIYtZ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/4XMQKnz.jpg
*laughs, then cries*
This made me chuckle, but Erik Jacobsen’s spot on identification of the problem made me laugh out loud.