May the Tallest and Fattest Win the Presidency

Posted to Infographics  |  Tags:  |  Nathan Yau

OPEN N.Y. put together an amusing (and informative) graphic for a New York Times op-chart. It shows the height and weight of presidential candidates dating back to 1896 when William McKinley, weighing in at 5 feet 7 inches, won the election to become 25th president of the United States. The tall lead 17-8 and the heaver lead 18-8. William J. Bryan didn’t stand a chance. Will Barack Obama add to the big and tall’s lead or will John McCain win one for the little guy?

[Thanks, Tom]

2 Comments

  • Amos Newcombe October 15, 2008 at 10:45 am

    So define “fattest”. Is Obama fatter than McCain just based on weight? Or is there some BMI calculation going on here? Evidently not, since the source article only says “weight”. Obviously the two are correlated, so knowing the taller candidate is favored, one would expect the heavier candidate to be favored as well. But fattest? That question has yet to be answered.

    Also, they guy who won is not always the guy who got the most votes. Are we — should we be — really talking about electoral success, or popularity?

    And did people like Bryan and FDR really have exactly the same measurement for each of their campaigns?

Favorites

10 Best Data Visualization Projects of 2017

It was a rough year, which brought about a lot of good work. Here are my favorite data visualization projects of the year.

19 Maps That Will Blow Your Mind and Change the Way You See the World. Top All-time. You Won’t Believe Your Eyes. Watch.

Many lists of maps promise to change the way you see the world, but this one actually does.

Watching the growth of Walmart – now with 100% more Sam’s Club

The ever so popular Walmart growth map gets an update, and yes, it still looks like a wildfire. Sam’s Club follows soon after, although not nearly as vigorously.

Where Bars Outnumber Grocery Stores

A closer look at the age old question of where there are more bars than grocery stores, and vice versa.