May the Tallest and Fattest Win the Presidency

Oct 7, 2008

OPEN N.Y. put together an amusing (and informative) graphic for a New York Times op-chart. It shows the height and weight of presidential candidates dating back to 1896 when William McKinley, weighing in at 5 feet 7 inches, won the election to become 25th president of the United States. The tall lead 17-8 and the heaver lead 18-8. William J. Bryan didn’t stand a chance. Will Barack Obama add to the big and tall’s lead or will John McCain win one for the little guy?

[Thanks, Tom]

2 Comments

  • Amos Newcombe October 15, 2008 at 10:45 am

    So define “fattest”. Is Obama fatter than McCain just based on weight? Or is there some BMI calculation going on here? Evidently not, since the source article only says “weight”. Obviously the two are correlated, so knowing the taller candidate is favored, one would expect the heavier candidate to be favored as well. But fattest? That question has yet to be answered.

    Also, they guy who won is not always the guy who got the most votes. Are we — should we be — really talking about electoral success, or popularity?

    And did people like Bryan and FDR really have exactly the same measurement for each of their campaigns?

Favorites

Unemployment in America, Mapped Over Time

Watch the regional changes across the country from 1990 to 2016.

How You Will Die

So far we’ve seen when you will die and how other people tend to die. Now let’s put the two together to see how and when you will die, given your sex, race, and age.

Reviving the Statistical Atlas of the United States with New Data

Due to budget cuts, there is no plan for an updated atlas. So I recreated the original 1870 Atlas using today’s publicly available data.

Where Bars Outnumber Grocery Stores

A closer look at the age old question of where there are more bars than grocery stores, and vice versa.