“Type I” and “Type II” errors, names first given by Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson to describe rejecting a null hypothesis when it’s true and accepting one when it’s not, are too vague for stat newcomers (and in general). This is better. [via]
Type I and II errors simplified
Visualize This: The FlowingData Guide to Design, Visualization, and Statistics (2nd Edition)
