What Simple Rules Should You Always Follow When Designing Infographics?

Posted by Nathan / Jul 23, 2008 to Forums / 9 comments

In the FlowingData forums, Ryan asks a really good question about data design:

What simple rules should we all follow when we present data?

I came up with three rules of thumb a while back, but surely there are more. Context, clarity, and real data are clear winners, but what else is there? Those are really broad and can be broken down a few ways - like reducing the number of variables could contribute to clarity. If you have any ideas, please do post your ideas to the forum thread.

Ah yes, I can hear you flipping through your Tufte books.

Like what you see? Subscribe to the FlowingData RSS feed to stay updated on what's new in data visualization.

    What now?

  • Subscribe to FlowingData Feed
  • Leave a comment

Comments

  • Bart
    Jul 23, 2008, 4:33 pm

    For me, it’s: tell a story. Don’t leave it to the viewer to guess what you’re trying to explain by showing them a graph or whatever.
    If you know what exactly you’re trying to explain, you’ll find the most logical way to show it.

  • Rob
    Jul 23, 2008, 4:37 pm

    I can’t recall where I first stumbled across these, but when designing visualizations I consider these:
    * What information does this allow me to compare?
    * How effortlessly can these comparisons be made?

  • Nathan
    Jul 23, 2008, 4:59 pm

    tell a story and comparisons - good ones

  • Ryan
    Jul 23, 2008, 5:27 pm

    Ah thank you Nathan for posting about this, hopefully it will generate a good discussion. My two so far (like I said in the forum) were “Make it stick” (even good information shown in a boring or unappealing way will not resonate with an audience) and “Content and Context” (meaning that numbers and data are great, but without a context, they carry less weight.)

  • Sara
    Jul 23, 2008, 5:39 pm

    Totally - make sure it tells the story you’re trying to tell. I always start from “what’s my story” and then “how do I tell that clearly, succinctly, and with the level of depth/completeness necessary?”

    All too often, loosely related “Data” is tossed up to “support” some claim, though it’s not a direct tie to the story.

  • Teoh Yi Chie
    Jul 24, 2008, 12:06 pm

    To quote Nigel Holmes,
    1. What’s the point of the graphic?
    2. What does the reader need to know?

  • Tom Whitmore
    Jul 25, 2008, 12:10 am

    I second the comment on context. And that means specifying a lot of things: what’s being measured, when, where, and other points.

    Remember the difference between graphics for analysis and graphics for presentation. The graphic you saw the answer in may well not be the best graphic for presenting it to others.

    If you can find a copy, the 1948 Census Manual of Tabular Presentation remains one of the best basic texts on the subject. It’s a lot more practical than Tufte.

  • Hadley
    Jul 27, 2008, 8:07 pm

    The “Manual of Tabular Presentation” is available online here: http://www.archive.org/details.....esentation, although unfortunately in the awkward djvu format.

  • Hadley
    Jul 27, 2008, 9:31 pm

    I have made a pdf version with searchable text from the tiff images, but I’m still fighting with acrobat to make it a decent size (it’s currently nearly 100 meg). Please email me if you’d like a copy.