Feed Sponsor

Pinpoint the best city in the world (with data) and win $10K

Jan 31, 2012

Thanks to BuzzData for sponsoring the FlowingData feed this week.

Economist Intelligence Unit and BuzzData launch competition challenging data-savvy readers to analyze and rank the world’s cities

THE COMPETITION:

The EIU’s Global Liveability Report ranks 140 cities worldwide based on factors such as stability, healthcare, education and infrastructure. Its data-driven analysis sparks debate on urban issues globally. Its Worldwide Cost of Living Index uses the prices of products and services to compare the cost of living in 140 world cities.

Now the EIU wants to hear your views on what makes a city great. Is it considering the right factors? In your opinion, which ones has it overlooked? The EIU is releasing its liveability data on BuzzData.com and challenging anyone to mine, mix and mash it up to create fresh perspectives on what makes a city truly great.

The winner will receive $10,000 for proving where the best city in the world is using data and a visualisation.

The EIU and BuzzData will be accepting submissions for the Best City in the World competition until March 4, 2012. Submission guidelines and further details can be found at http://buzzdata.com/best-city-contest.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER AT #BestCityContest

WATCH THE CONTEST GUIDE VIDEO: http://vimeo.com/35770448

Press inquiries and other questions can be sent to [email protected]

Favorites

10 Best Data Visualization Projects of 2015

These are my picks for the best of 2015. As usual, they could easily appear in a different order on a different day, and there are projects not on the list that were also excellent.

Where People Run in Major Cities

There are many exercise apps that allow you to keep …

Years You Have Left to Live, Probably

The individual data points of life are much less predictable than the average. Here’s a simulation that shows you how much time is left on the clock.

Shifting Incomes for American Jobs

For various occupations, the difference between the person who makes the most and the one who makes the least can be significant.