<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stack Overflow for data geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Turian</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/#comment-47044</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Turian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=9898#comment-47044</guid>
		<description>Stefan,

Why don&#039;t you try posting your question on MetaOptimize, and seeing if you get a good response? That&#039;s a good way to give MetaOptimize a try too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan,</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you try posting your question on MetaOptimize, and seeing if you get a good response? That&#8217;s a good way to give MetaOptimize a try too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Lasiewski</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/#comment-47030</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Lasiewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=9898#comment-47030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a SE user, and participate on Area51.

I created a proposal for &quot;Infographics and Data Visualization&quot; on Area51. See here:

http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/11508/infographics-and-data-visualization

I created this proposal before reading about MetaOptimize.  My attitude on these things is to wait and see if the area51 community likes my proposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a SE user, and participate on Area51.</p>
<p>I created a proposal for &#8220;Infographics and Data Visualization&#8221; on Area51. See here:</p>
<p><a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/11508/infographics-and-data-visualization" rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....ualization</a></p>
<p>I created this proposal before reading about MetaOptimize.  My attitude on these things is to wait and see if the area51 community likes my proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Turian</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/#comment-46936</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Turian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=9898#comment-46936</guid>
		<description>Madelaine,

The main reason I launched my Q+A site is because, if Area 51 had their druthers, they would have fragmented the community into five niches:

machine learning (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/7607/machine-learn...)

NLP (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2761/natural-langu...)

statistical analysis (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/33/statistical-ana...)

data mining (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/4229/data-mining)

AI (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/6607/artificial-in...)

This niching is completely wrongheaded. The last thing we need is for ML people, NLP practitioners, and statisticians to communicate less. &lt;em&gt;The fact that these groups attend different conferences is a BUG not a feature.&lt;/em&gt; My site was designed so that these adjacent fields can crosspolinate information.

As we’ve learned from StackOverflow, it’s better to pick a broad topic and have a lot of experts in one place, communicating and helping with each other’s problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madelaine,</p>
<p>The main reason I launched my Q+A site is because, if Area 51 had their druthers, they would have fragmented the community into five niches:</p>
<p>machine learning (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/7607/machine-learn.." rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....ne-learn..</a>.)</p>
<p>NLP (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2761/natural-langu.." rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....al-langu..</a>.)</p>
<p>statistical analysis (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/33/statistical-ana.." rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....ical-ana..</a>.)</p>
<p>data mining (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/4229/data-mining" rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....ata-mining</a>)</p>
<p>AI (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/6607/artificial-in.." rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....icial-in..</a>.)</p>
<p>This niching is completely wrongheaded. The last thing we need is for ML people, NLP practitioners, and statisticians to communicate less. <em>The fact that these groups attend different conferences is a BUG not a feature.</em> My site was designed so that these adjacent fields can crosspolinate information.</p>
<p>As we’ve learned from StackOverflow, it’s better to pick a broad topic and have a lot of experts in one place, communicating and helping with each other’s problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madelaine</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/#comment-46922</link>
		<dc:creator>Madelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=9898#comment-46922</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also a potential statistical analysis stack overflow brewing here:
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/33/statistical-analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also a potential statistical analysis stack overflow brewing here:<br />
<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/33/statistical-analysis" rel="nofollow">http://area51.stackexchange.co.....l-analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/07/06/stack-overflow-for-data-geeks/#comment-46911</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=9898#comment-46911</guid>
		<description>Assembly FTW!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assembly FTW!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

