<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infographer &#187; Пособие по информационной графике от Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39643</link>
		<dc:creator>Infographer &#187; Пособие по информационной графике от Wall Street Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39643</guid>
		<description>[...] у Эдварда Тафти. Обзор книги любезно опубликовал Natan&#160;&#8212; привожу [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] у Эдварда Тафти. Обзор книги любезно опубликовал Natan&nbsp;&mdash; привожу [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39346</guid>
		<description>It is a shame a book like this &quot;doesn&#039;t go deep into theory or get sidetracked by the history of information graphics&quot; because i think there is a gap in the literature about a critical theory of infographics. Tufte&#039;s work is useful, but there are a set of epistemological questions about the use of information in infographics which need to be addressed if the field is to do anything more than describe information in a graphical way. I&#039;m particularly thinking of third parties with little understanding of research methodologies creates a graphic from data they didn&#039;t collect or process. There are reasons why pie charts are evil and why they aren&#039;t used by, for example, academics. They look nice, but can lead to misinterpretation of figures, especially when circles are used to compare numbers by relative area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame a book like this &#8220;doesn&#8217;t go deep into theory or get sidetracked by the history of information graphics&#8221; because i think there is a gap in the literature about a critical theory of infographics. Tufte&#8217;s work is useful, but there are a set of epistemological questions about the use of information in infographics which need to be addressed if the field is to do anything more than describe information in a graphical way. I&#8217;m particularly thinking of third parties with little understanding of research methodologies creates a graphic from data they didn&#8217;t collect or process. There are reasons why pie charts are evil and why they aren&#8217;t used by, for example, academics. They look nice, but can lead to misinterpretation of figures, especially when circles are used to compare numbers by relative area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maja</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39332</link>
		<dc:creator>maja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39332</guid>
		<description>I thought pie charts were an absolute no-no in the book of Tufte? I don&#039;t care what colour or boldness the labels have, they&#039;re still evil!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought pie charts were an absolute no-no in the book of Tufte? I don&#8217;t care what colour or boldness the labels have, they&#8217;re still evil!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Jeyes</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39282</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Jeyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39282</guid>
		<description>In this book, Dona boils down all of the theory from Tufte&#039;s work and turns it into useful and practical guidelines for information display. If you&#039;re looking to develop guidelines for your company&#039;s charting and information graphics, Wong&#039;s book is an absolute must-read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this book, Dona boils down all of the theory from Tufte&#8217;s work and turns it into useful and practical guidelines for information display. If you&#8217;re looking to develop guidelines for your company&#8217;s charting and information graphics, Wong&#8217;s book is an absolute must-read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Research &#171; Data Visualization: Topics in Graphic Design</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39155</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Research &#171; Data Visualization: Topics in Graphic Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39155</guid>
		<description>[...]  Posted in Uncategorized by rcastro14 on February 19, 2010   Here is an article on Flowing Data on what Ben Fry and Tuff. talks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted in Uncategorized by rcastro14 on February 19, 2010   Here is an article on Flowing Data on what Ben Fry and Tuff. talks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlena</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39137</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39137</guid>
		<description>I second Rob&#039;s suggestion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Rob&#8217;s suggestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39131</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39131</guid>
		<description>@Darrell - that link didn&#039;t work either..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darrell &#8211; that link didn&#8217;t work either..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39130</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39130</guid>
		<description>Sorry, bad link, http://tinyurl.com/y8gzpzf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, bad link, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y8gzpzf" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y8gzpzf</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39129</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39129</guid>
		<description>I kind of question WSJ&#039;s advice on making information graphics after seeing this: http://img.waffleimages.com/faadd6bb46d9241654c63b7cce575ae7843e4306/wsj1.png

&quot;Look at how defense spending has hardly change, but Medicare spending is soaring upward.  Please just ignore the fact they&#039;re on totally different scales.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of question WSJ&#8217;s advice on making information graphics after seeing this: <a href="http://img.waffleimages.com/faadd6bb46d9241654c63b7cce575ae7843e4306/wsj1.png" rel="nofollow">http://img.waffleimages.com/fa.....6/wsj1.png</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Look at how defense spending has hardly change, but Medicare spending is soaring upward.  Please just ignore the fact they&#8217;re on totally different scales.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/18/review-the-wall-street-journal-guide-to-information-graphics/#comment-39125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5393#comment-39125</guid>
		<description>I would be interested in seeing a list of other books you recommend as a good starting point and perhaps for more advanced topics. I&#039;m familiar with Tufte, of course (who isn&#039;t?) but I&#039;m always interested in finding something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in seeing a list of other books you recommend as a good starting point and perhaps for more advanced topics. I&#8217;m familiar with Tufte, of course (who isn&#8217;t?) but I&#8217;m always interested in finding something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

