<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data.gov.uk versus Data.gov &#8211; Which wins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; The Future of Open Data Looks Like&#8230;Github?</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-43399</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; The Future of Open Data Looks Like&#8230;Github?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-43399</guid>
		<description>[...] When we&#8217;re talking about data, we typically start with open data. What we mean, in general, is access and availability. The ability to discover and procure a given dataset with a minimum of friction. Think Data.gov or Data.gov.uk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When we&#8217;re talking about data, we typically start with open data. What we mean, in general, is access and availability. The ability to discover and procure a given dataset with a minimum of friction. Think Data.gov or Data.gov.uk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-02-04 &#171; Vorsprung durch Burokratie</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-42408</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-02-04 &#171; Vorsprung durch Burokratie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-42408</guid>
		<description>[...] Data.gov.uk versus Data.gov – Which wins? &#124; FlowingData &quot;Back in May last year, the US government launched Data.gov as a statement of transparency, and the Internet rejoiced. After the launch, excitement kind of fizzled with the actual Data.gov site. Then just a couple of weeks ago, Data.gov.uk launched, which brought me back to the US counterpart. How do the two compare? Here&#039;s my take. ...&quot; (tags: data open government)    Tagged as: data, stats Leave a comment     Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Data.gov.uk versus Data.gov – Which wins? | FlowingData &quot;Back in May last year, the US government launched Data.gov as a statement of transparency, and the Internet rejoiced. After the launch, excitement kind of fizzled with the actual Data.gov site. Then just a couple of weeks ago, Data.gov.uk launched, which brought me back to the US counterpart. How do the two compare? Here&#39;s my take. &#8230;&quot; (tags: data open government)    Tagged as: data, stats Leave a comment     Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Données publiques en France: Girondins vs Montagnards ? &#124; Owni.fr</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-39326</link>
		<dc:creator>Données publiques en France: Girondins vs Montagnards ? &#124; Owni.fr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-39326</guid>
		<description>[...] la plateforme américaine Datagov et la plateforme anglaise datagov.uk, Flowing Data indique sa préférence pour la version anglaise, plus accessible, elle est plus démocratique. Un catalogue centrale des données est pourtant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la plateforme américaine Datagov et la plateforme anglaise datagov.uk, Flowing Data indique sa préférence pour la version anglaise, plus accessible, elle est plus démocratique. Un catalogue centrale des données est pourtant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonnÃ©es publiques en France: Girondins vs Montagnards ? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-39276</link>
		<dc:creator>DonnÃ©es publiques en France: Girondins vs Montagnards ? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-39276</guid>
		<description>[...] la plateforme amÃ©ricaine Datagov et la plateforme anglaise datagov.uk, Flowing Data indique sa prÃ©fÃ©rence pour la version anglaise, plus accessible, elle est plus dÃ©mocratique. Un catalogue centrale des donnÃ©es est pourtant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la plateforme amÃ©ricaine Datagov et la plateforme anglaise datagov.uk, Flowing Data indique sa prÃ©fÃ©rence pour la version anglaise, plus accessible, elle est plus dÃ©mocratique. Un catalogue centrale des donnÃ©es est pourtant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carey</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38896</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38896</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

Very interesting post from our perspective as Im aware of 3 sites already listed by our customers on data.gov.uk and more are adding there projects.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>Very interesting post from our perspective as Im aware of 3 sites already listed by our customers on data.gov.uk and more are adding there projects.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Data: hoe nu verder? â€” Ambtenaar 2.0</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38826</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Data: hoe nu verder? â€” Ambtenaar 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38826</guid>
		<description>[...] onderzoeken.Vergelijking tussen data.gov en data.gov.uk data.gov.uk data.govHet overzicht waarin de Amerikaans en de Britse aanpak met elkaar worden vergeleken zou een eerste opmaat naar de volgende stap in de ontwikkeling en aanbieding van open data kunnen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] onderzoeken.Vergelijking tussen data.gov en data.gov.uk data.gov.uk data.govHet overzicht waarin de Amerikaans en de Britse aanpak met elkaar worden vergeleken zou een eerste opmaat naar de volgende stap in de ontwikkeling en aanbieding van open data kunnen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digest #23 : ::: Think Macro :::</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38793</link>
		<dc:creator>Digest #23 : ::: Think Macro :::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38793</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Data.gov.uk versus Data.gov â€“ Which wins?&#8221; &#8211; FollowingData analyzes the two websites and declares the UK site as a winner. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Data.gov.uk versus Data.gov â€“ Which wins?&#8221; &#8211; FollowingData analyzes the two websites and declares the UK site as a winner. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. DAVID STEPHENSON</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38747</link>
		<dc:creator>W. DAVID STEPHENSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38747</guid>
		<description>Data.gov definitely not user-friendly, and I do think, unless there are some legal issues I&#039;m unaware of (or if they&#039;re concerned about having some interest group hijack the site) that it would be better if they hosted threaded discussions on visualizations and/or data, a la Swivel or Many Eyes. Hey, all of these sites are works in progress, and I suspect that there will be rapid progress as citizens force their government to follow innovations others have introduced.  Virtuous competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data.gov definitely not user-friendly, and I do think, unless there are some legal issues I&#8217;m unaware of (or if they&#8217;re concerned about having some interest group hijack the site) that it would be better if they hosted threaded discussions on visualizations and/or data, a la Swivel or Many Eyes. Hey, all of these sites are works in progress, and I suspect that there will be rapid progress as citizens force their government to follow innovations others have introduced.  Virtuous competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38745</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38745</guid>
		<description>i was going off this table on data.gov for &quot;raw datasets&#039;:

http://www.data.gov/reports/agencyparticipants

but yes, now i see they&#039;ve split up geodata and raw data. why they don&#039;t have some kind of universal search is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was going off this table on data.gov for &#8220;raw datasets&#8217;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.data.gov/reports/agencyparticipants" rel="nofollow">http://www.data.gov/reports/agencyparticipants</a></p>
<p>but yes, now i see they&#8217;ve split up geodata and raw data. why they don&#8217;t have some kind of universal search is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. DAVID STEPHENSON</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/02/04/data-gov-uk-versus-data-gov-which-wins/#comment-38742</link>
		<dc:creator>W. DAVID STEPHENSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=5053#comment-38742</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know where you got the figure of &quot;several hundred&quot; data sets on Data.gov.  It reached 100,000 last July: http://j.mp/BXtFS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know where you got the figure of &#8220;several hundred&#8221; data sets on Data.gov.  It reached 100,000 last July: <a href="http://j.mp/BXtFS" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/BXtFS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

