<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Visual History of Loudness in Popular Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; A Visual History of Loudness in Popular Music &#124; FlowingData sumit/blog</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-39469</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; A Visual History of Loudness in Popular Music &#124; FlowingData sumit/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-39469</guid>
		<description>[...] via http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via <a href="http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/" rel="nofollow">http://flowingdata.com/2010/01.....lar-music/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic L.</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38822</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38822</guid>
		<description>This is why I stay away from mainstream releases coming out now. Independent labels and others that have no chance of having a single played on radio tend to produce music at the volume it should be mastered at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I stay away from mainstream releases coming out now. Independent labels and others that have no chance of having a single played on radio tend to produce music at the volume it should be mastered at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindiwe</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38236</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindiwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38236</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you add a &#039;re-tweet&#039; button to your amazing articles? I would make them so much easier to share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you add a &#8216;re-tweet&#8217; button to your amazing articles? I would make them so much easier to share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die Musik wird immer lauterâ€¦ &#8211; Openmedi</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38210</link>
		<dc:creator>Die Musik wird immer lauterâ€¦ &#8211; Openmedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38210</guid>
		<description>[...] Mehr Infos gibtâ€™s bei Flowing Data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mehr Infos gibtâ€™s bei Flowing Data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bedtimebunnage.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why so loud?</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38035</link>
		<dc:creator>bedtimebunnage.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why so loud?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38035</guid>
		<description>[...] ***original post*** [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ***original post*** [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38024</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38024</guid>
		<description>I actually wrote about this concept last year, often known as &quot;The Loudness War&quot;: http://lithe.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/the-loudness-war/

I&#039;m not sure how we can even begin to reverse the effect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually wrote about this concept last year, often known as &#8220;The Loudness War&#8221;: <a href="http://lithe.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/the-loudness-war/" rel="nofollow">http://lithe.wordpress.com/200.....dness-war/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how we can even begin to reverse the effect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things I learned this week &#8211; #2 &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-38016</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I learned this week &#8211; #2 &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-38016</guid>
		<description>[...] links toÂ a great infographic showing how popular music has become louder in recent years through the use of compressors. I also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links toÂ a great infographic showing how popular music has become louder in recent years through the use of compressors. I also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friday digest no. 4 / what consumes me, bud caddell</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-37970</link>
		<dc:creator>friday digest no. 4 / what consumes me, bud caddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-37970</guid>
		<description>[...] A Visual History of Loudness in Popular Music â€“ Mom&#8217;s everywhere rejoice vindicated, today&#8217;s music IS louder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Visual History of Loudness in Popular Music â€“ Mom&#8217;s everywhere rejoice vindicated, today&#8217;s music IS louder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-37933</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-37933</guid>
		<description>Yes, only with regard to dynamic range. All other things (including recording equipment, sampling rate, etc, etc) assumed to be equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, only with regard to dynamic range. All other things (including recording equipment, sampling rate, etc, etc) assumed to be equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnimator</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2010/01/05/a-visual-history-of-loudness-in-popular-music/#comment-37932</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnimator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=4686#comment-37932</guid>
		<description>A simple experiment is enough - if you own both a cd player and an old-fashioned analogue record-player, and a cd and vinyl copy of the same album. 
Switch the source on your amplifier from &quot;cd&quot; to &quot;phono&quot; (or whatever input serves the record player) at similar points of the same track.
The cd will sound louder but the extremes will have been surpressed - or deleted totally - to save digital disc space.
The record&#039;s playback volume will need turning up to match the actual sound emanating from the speakers, and you should hear more levels or tracks, such as hi-hat, cymbals, etc at one end, and more bass, kick-drum, etc at the other.
Nowt to do with graphs and that, just personal experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple experiment is enough &#8211; if you own both a cd player and an old-fashioned analogue record-player, and a cd and vinyl copy of the same album.<br />
Switch the source on your amplifier from &#8220;cd&#8221; to &#8220;phono&#8221; (or whatever input serves the record player) at similar points of the same track.<br />
The cd will sound louder but the extremes will have been surpressed &#8211; or deleted totally &#8211; to save digital disc space.<br />
The record&#8217;s playback volume will need turning up to match the actual sound emanating from the speakers, and you should hear more levels or tracks, such as hi-hat, cymbals, etc at one end, and more bass, kick-drum, etc at the other.<br />
Nowt to do with graphs and that, just personal experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

