<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Land Mass and Population by Country</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infographic eye candy roundup : Lauren Rae Orsini</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-37120</link>
		<dc:creator>Infographic eye candy roundup : Lauren Rae Orsini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-37120</guid>
		<description>[...] Infographic to check out first: Land Mass and Population by Country. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Infographic to check out first: Land Mass and Population by Country. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natalie</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-36174</link>
		<dc:creator>natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-36174</guid>
		<description>agreed.  best to align on an edge, in order of relative values (either population or area, but NOT centered randomly).  How about arrange in order of decreasing area along one line, then repeat the series along another line above the first, in order of increasing population, centered on at least one record point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.  best to align on an edge, in order of relative values (either population or area, but NOT centered randomly).  How about arrange in order of decreasing area along one line, then repeat the series along another line above the first, in order of increasing population, centered on at least one record point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35816</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35816</guid>
		<description>graphics made completely for the digg crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>graphics made completely for the digg crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35806</guid>
		<description>Eye-catching and ineffective, like so many other info visualizations.

Bubbles, we&#039;ve beaten to death the problems with encoding values using area.

Why the recent infatuation with ten foot tall (sorry, that&#039;s ten meters for you non-USians) graphics. By the time I scroll down a screen, I&#039;ve already conveniently forgotten what I saw a moment ago.

To actually display the data, a bar chart or dot plot would work best. Or maybe two, one sorted by area, the other by population. Throw in a third with population density, just for fun. Make one yellow, another orange, and the third the color of bacon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eye-catching and ineffective, like so many other info visualizations.</p>
<p>Bubbles, we&#8217;ve beaten to death the problems with encoding values using area.</p>
<p>Why the recent infatuation with ten foot tall (sorry, that&#8217;s ten meters for you non-USians) graphics. By the time I scroll down a screen, I&#8217;ve already conveniently forgotten what I saw a moment ago.</p>
<p>To actually display the data, a bar chart or dot plot would work best. Or maybe two, one sorted by area, the other by population. Throw in a third with population density, just for fun. Make one yellow, another orange, and the third the color of bacon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STNDE &#124; LAND MASS &#124; äººå£å¯†åº¦ã‚’ãƒ“ã‚¸ãƒ¥ã‚¢ãƒ©ã‚¤ã‚º</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35721</link>
		<dc:creator>STNDE &#124; LAND MASS &#124; äººå£å¯†åº¦ã‚’ãƒ“ã‚¸ãƒ¥ã‚¢ãƒ©ã‚¤ã‚º</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35721</guid>
		<description>[...] Flowing Dataã§ã‚‚ã“ã®&#8221;ç›®çŽ‰ç„¼ãã®é¢¨&#8221;ãŒè©±é¡Œã«ãªã£ã¦ãŠã‚Šã€ã‚³ãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒˆæ¬„ã‚’è¦‹ã‚‹ã¨ãƒ™ãƒ¼ã‚³ãƒ³ãƒã‚¿ãŒä¸ŠãŒã£ã¦ãŸã‚Šã—ã¦é¢ç™½ã„ã§ã™ã€‚  Tags: Herald Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flowing Dataã§ã‚‚ã“ã®&#8221;ç›®çŽ‰ç„¼ãã®é¢¨&#8221;ãŒè©±é¡Œã«ãªã£ã¦ãŠã‚Šã€ã‚³ãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒˆæ¬„ã‚’è¦‹ã‚‹ã¨ãƒ™ãƒ¼ã‚³ãƒ³ãƒã‚¿ãŒä¸ŠãŒã£ã¦ãŸã‚Šã—ã¦é¢ç™½ã„ã§ã™ã€‚  Tags: Herald Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35719</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what story this tells.  Should the countries with lot&#039;s of land start spreading their population out?  India is the only one that is interesting at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what story this tells.  Should the countries with lot&#8217;s of land start spreading their population out?  India is the only one that is interesting at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35695</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35695</guid>
		<description>I think using a global elevation data set and calculating slope might get an estimate of livable land, presuming people can&#039;t build on a certain percent slope.  Not entirely accurate but a good starting point.  Also taking out all the water bodies would be another way to remove land that isn&#039;t usable.

Just some thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think using a global elevation data set and calculating slope might get an estimate of livable land, presuming people can&#8217;t build on a certain percent slope.  Not entirely accurate but a good starting point.  Also taking out all the water bodies would be another way to remove land that isn&#8217;t usable.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hazy</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35681</link>
		<dc:creator>hazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35681</guid>
		<description>india looks yummy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>india looks yummy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpycow</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35666</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpycow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35666</guid>
		<description>I agree, the &quot;land per person&quot; comparison would make this a whole lot more useful. It&#039;s kind of meaningless to compare people and sq km without knowing what the relationship is between the two. The question that springs to my mind is something like &quot;is China full yet?&quot; The graphic doesn&#039;t answer that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the &#8220;land per person&#8221; comparison would make this a whole lot more useful. It&#8217;s kind of meaningless to compare people and sq km without knowing what the relationship is between the two. The question that springs to my mind is something like &#8220;is China full yet?&#8221; The graphic doesn&#8217;t answer that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Kistner</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/#comment-35665</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Kistner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=3805#comment-35665</guid>
		<description>Came here to say this. Graphs using full circles for area to compare values always fail (for me, anyhow). I think most humans are bad at properly comparing the area of two circles, because you can&#039;t visually pack circle in the other and see the remainder as a single circle.

Look at India above, for example, where it appears that the outer circle has about twice the radius of the inner. Can you tell me that you can see that three of those inner orange circles could be put in the remaining whitespace?

And then there&#039;s the confusion of whether it&#039;s the area or radius being used for comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came here to say this. Graphs using full circles for area to compare values always fail (for me, anyhow). I think most humans are bad at properly comparing the area of two circles, because you can&#8217;t visually pack circle in the other and see the remainder as a single circle.</p>
<p>Look at India above, for example, where it appears that the outer circle has about twice the radius of the inner. Can you tell me that you can see that three of those inner orange circles could be put in the remaining whitespace?</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the confusion of whether it&#8217;s the area or radius being used for comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

