<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking a Closer Look at Airplane-Bird Collisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-32421</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-32421</guid>
		<description>ha, i guess that explains some things :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, i guess that explains some things :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-32420</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-32420</guid>
		<description>Just came across details of a &quot;white-tailed deer&quot; incident. It confirms that the &#039;bird&#039; was in fact a deer which was hit on take-off!

Date: 11 January 1990
Aircraft: Hawker Siddeley
Airport: John Tune (TN)
Phase of Flight: Takeoff run
Damage: Engine (aircraft damaged beyond repair)
Wildlife Species: White-tailed deer
Comments from Report: Several deer were struck during takeoff. One was completely ingested in the left engine. The impact tore the engine loose from the aircraft. The aircraft had to be replaced at a cost of $1.4 million.

Source: http://wildlife.pr.erau.edu/sig_strikes_2009.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across details of a &#8220;white-tailed deer&#8221; incident. It confirms that the &#8216;bird&#8217; was in fact a deer which was hit on take-off!</p>
<p>Date: 11 January 1990<br />
Aircraft: Hawker Siddeley<br />
Airport: John Tune (TN)<br />
Phase of Flight: Takeoff run<br />
Damage: Engine (aircraft damaged beyond repair)<br />
Wildlife Species: White-tailed deer<br />
Comments from Report: Several deer were struck during takeoff. One was completely ingested in the left engine. The impact tore the engine loose from the aircraft. The aircraft had to be replaced at a cost of $1.4 million.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://wildlife.pr.erau.edu/sig_strikes_2009.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://wildlife.pr.erau.edu/sig_strikes_2009.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31774</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31774</guid>
		<description>So just like the Hudson River incident, I really need to be paranoid, I need to be worried around take-off (as well as approach). 

But I fly a lot in the Southeast. If you click on the Canadian goose line in the bar chart, the map changes. It sure looks like those Canadian geese that are such a problem for other areas are not a problem for where I go - thank goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just like the Hudson River incident, I really need to be paranoid, I need to be worried around take-off (as well as approach). </p>
<p>But I fly a lot in the Southeast. If you click on the Canadian goose line in the bar chart, the map changes. It sure looks like those Canadian geese that are such a problem for other areas are not a problem for where I go &#8211; thank goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler Holcomb</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31767</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler Holcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31767</guid>
		<description>Crows are probably in the &quot;blackbird&quot; category.  Telling a crow from a raven can be difficult even for an avid bird watcher, so it makes sense that call Corvids  put medium-size dark bird, such as starlings, are all lumped as &quot;black birds.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crows are probably in the &#8220;blackbird&#8221; category.  Telling a crow from a raven can be difficult even for an avid bird watcher, so it makes sense that call Corvids  put medium-size dark bird, such as starlings, are all lumped as &#8220;black birds.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mako</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31761</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mako</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31761</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

Do you have a link for where the raw data used in this visualization came from?

I believe there are some key variables that because of their omission, skew the visualization. For instance, if there are a great deal more flights during the day, there will be more Airplane-Bird Collisions during the day. I would be interested in see the percentage of flights that had a collision broken down by time of day instead of just count by time of day.

I would also be interested in the level of detail goes down to individual airports, and then plot their Lat/Lon on the map instead of the state Lat/Lon with a mark that is sized based on percent of collisions per flights. 

The rarity of a bird species in each state or region may be another factor to consider.

In order to reach this viewpoint, additional data sources may need to be merged in. But having a link the data source with counts of incidents would a good starting point to reach these goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>Do you have a link for where the raw data used in this visualization came from?</p>
<p>I believe there are some key variables that because of their omission, skew the visualization. For instance, if there are a great deal more flights during the day, there will be more Airplane-Bird Collisions during the day. I would be interested in see the percentage of flights that had a collision broken down by time of day instead of just count by time of day.</p>
<p>I would also be interested in the level of detail goes down to individual airports, and then plot their Lat/Lon on the map instead of the state Lat/Lon with a mark that is sized based on percent of collisions per flights. </p>
<p>The rarity of a bird species in each state or region may be another factor to consider.</p>
<p>In order to reach this viewpoint, additional data sources may need to be merged in. But having a link the data source with counts of incidents would a good starting point to reach these goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simfish Inquilinekea</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31758</link>
		<dc:creator>Simfish Inquilinekea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31758</guid>
		<description>Notice how there are no crows on the list (despite their abundance everywhere). Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how there are no crows on the list (despite their abundance everywhere). Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31756</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31756</guid>
		<description>There was a pretty funny article in Vanity Fair a few months ago about the Hudson River incident. I think the author may have referenced some of the stats...

http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2009/06/us_airways200906</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a pretty funny article in Vanity Fair a few months ago about the Hudson River incident. I think the author may have referenced some of the stats&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2009/06/us_airways200906" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanityfair.com/styl.....ways200906</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31754</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31754</guid>
		<description>I read somewhere that Memphis was high in the rankings for bird strikes because our airport (KMEM) has the most night traffic due to the FedEx hub. Interesting it isn&#039;t on your chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere that Memphis was high in the rankings for bird strikes because our airport (KMEM) has the most night traffic due to the FedEx hub. Interesting it isn&#8217;t on your chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31750</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31750</guid>
		<description>trust me, it is. a rare breed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trust me, it is. a rare breed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/16/taking-a-closer-look-at-airplane-bird-collisions/#comment-31749</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=2212#comment-31749</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware that &#039;White-tailed deer&#039; was a bird species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware that &#8216;White-tailed deer&#8217; was a bird species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

