<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion Rates in the United States, 1970-2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-32416</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-32416</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many people travel long distances to get abortions in NY since itâ€™s one of the few places in the US where itâ€™s possible to get one if youâ€™re late-term.&quot;

Actually, NY isn&#039;t one of those places.  Late-term abortions are heavily restricted in NY.

The key to understanding this map is that the data is from 1970-2005.  Roe V. Wade was decided in 1973.  Prior to Roe V. Wade, only two of the lower 48 states allowed abortion for non-health-threatening reasons -- NY and WA.  So during this 3-year head start, all of the (legal) abortions in the mainland US were concentrated in NY and WA.  It&#039;s likely women traveled from all over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many people travel long distances to get abortions in NY since itâ€™s one of the few places in the US where itâ€™s possible to get one if youâ€™re late-term.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, NY isn&#8217;t one of those places.  Late-term abortions are heavily restricted in NY.</p>
<p>The key to understanding this map is that the data is from 1970-2005.  Roe V. Wade was decided in 1973.  Prior to Roe V. Wade, only two of the lower 48 states allowed abortion for non-health-threatening reasons &#8212; NY and WA.  So during this 3-year head start, all of the (legal) abortions in the mainland US were concentrated in NY and WA.  It&#8217;s likely women traveled from all over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-31488</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-31488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to the tutorial -- I want to start mapping in R myself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the tutorial &#8212; I want to start mapping in R myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunya</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-31092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-31092</guid>
		<description>The question of abortions  by residents of a state as opposed to abortions performed in a state is an important one. Many people travel long distances to get abortions in NY since it&#039;s one of the few places in the US where it&#039;s possible to get one if you&#039;re late-term.

Also important is the availability of abortion-providers, which is some states may be in the single digits. You can&#039;t get an abortion if you can&#039;t GET an abortion. 

Finally,  the using the area of a state to represent it is, of course, misleading in terms of population, and therefore frequency of any human activity. Fight the non-normative norm!

Thanks for the discussion. 
s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of abortions  by residents of a state as opposed to abortions performed in a state is an important one. Many people travel long distances to get abortions in NY since it&#8217;s one of the few places in the US where it&#8217;s possible to get one if you&#8217;re late-term.</p>
<p>Also important is the availability of abortion-providers, which is some states may be in the single digits. You can&#8217;t get an abortion if you can&#8217;t GET an abortion. </p>
<p>Finally,  the using the area of a state to represent it is, of course, misleading in terms of population, and therefore frequency of any human activity. Fight the non-normative norm!</p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion.<br />
s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dormilon</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-31046</link>
		<dc:creator>dormilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-31046</guid>
		<description>Will we ever devise a standard way to ensure that we include ALL 50 states? Or is Roe v. Wade inapplicable in Alaska and Hawaii?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we ever devise a standard way to ensure that we include ALL 50 states? Or is Roe v. Wade inapplicable in Alaska and Hawaii?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roundup: Third-Trimester Abortions May Continue in Kansas</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-31022</link>
		<dc:creator>digg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roundup: Third-Trimester Abortions May Continue in Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-31022</guid>
		<description>[...] June 12: Flowing Data:Abortion Rates in the United States, 1970-2005 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 12: Flowing Data:Abortion Rates in the United States, 1970-2005 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Etcetera, Moonday 20090615 &#124; ideonexus.com</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-30977</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Etcetera, Moonday 20090615 &#124; ideonexus.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-30977</guid>
		<description>[...] Wyoming has had 14 between 1970 and 2005, and New York has had 124,849 according to a map of abortion rates in the U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wyoming has had 14 between 1970 and 2005, and New York has had 124,849 according to a map of abortion rates in the U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-30913</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-30913</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s an excellent point. Since it&#039;s a per 1,000 base, it&#039;s all still relative, but having that companion count at the same time may be somewhat revealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s an excellent point. Since it&#8217;s a per 1,000 base, it&#8217;s all still relative, but having that companion count at the same time may be somewhat revealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-30910</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-30910</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll post a tutorial once i get my junk in order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll post a tutorial once i get my junk in order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveW</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-30905</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-30905</guid>
		<description>Lotiat, Yellow?  Gray?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lotiat, Yellow?  Gray?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elana</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/06/12/abortion-rates-in-the-united-states-1970-2005/#comment-30897</link>
		<dc:creator>elana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1679#comment-30897</guid>
		<description>I agree that it would be more impactful with a shorter time frame and overlaid with information about access to abortion services, for instance the number of clinics in a state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it would be more impactful with a shorter time frame and overlaid with information about access to abortion services, for instance the number of clinics in a state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

