<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics Data Made More Informative &#8211; Dshbrd by DabbleDB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extenuating Circumstances &#8211; links for 2009-05-31</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/#comment-30315</link>
		<dc:creator>Extenuating Circumstances &#8211; links for 2009-05-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1573#comment-30315</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Analytics Data Made More Informative - Dshbrd by DabbleDB &#124; FlowingData Very nice (tags: googleanalytics visualisation dabbledb) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Analytics Data Made More Informative &#8211; Dshbrd by DabbleDB | FlowingData Very nice (tags: googleanalytics visualisation dabbledb) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Yingling</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/#comment-30162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Yingling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1573#comment-30162</guid>
		<description>I too was wondering about the vertical timescale, but seems pretty readable. I&#039;ve actually been doing a bit of this myself by pulling data out of google analytics and making my own charts to trying to see referral trends..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was wondering about the vertical timescale, but seems pretty readable. I&#8217;ve actually been doing a bit of this myself by pulling data out of google analytics and making my own charts to trying to see referral trends..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/#comment-30150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1573#comment-30150</guid>
		<description>Interesting. At first I thought the vertical and horizontal time axes would produce confusion, but after looking at about four screen shots on their web sit, it actually began to make sense. A vertical time scale is still a bit strange, but maybe they can pull it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. At first I thought the vertical and horizontal time axes would produce confusion, but after looking at about four screen shots on their web sit, it actually began to make sense. A vertical time scale is still a bit strange, but maybe they can pull it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Bryant</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/28/google-analytics-data-made-more-informative-dshbrd/#comment-30146</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1573#comment-30146</guid>
		<description>Nathan, thanks for the writeup.  We do indeed plan to turn this into a fee-based service; introductory pricing will probably be in the $5/month range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, thanks for the writeup.  We do indeed plan to turn this into a fee-based service; introductory pricing will probably be in the $5/month range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

