<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Data Visualization Framework &#8211; Axiis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: de schoonheid van data &#124;</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-51858</link>
		<dc:creator>de schoonheid van data &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-51858</guid>
		<description>[...] is het eenvoudig om visualisaties te maken. Soortgelijke programma&#8217;s (als OpenDX, Axiis, FlowingData, DrasticData) zijn iets minder eenvoudig te doorgronden, maar leveren wel imposante visualisaties, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is het eenvoudig om visualisaties te maken. Soortgelijke programma&#8217;s (als OpenDX, Axiis, FlowingData, DrasticData) zijn iets minder eenvoudig te doorgronden, maar leveren wel imposante visualisaties, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever 25 May 2009 &#124; PTS Blog</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-31416</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever 25 May 2009 &#124; PTS Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-31416</guid>
		<description>[...] FlowingData I read about a new open-source visualization framework called Axiis, which has been released under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FlowingData I read about a new open-source visualization framework called Axiis, which has been released under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: System Advancements at the Monastery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Setting Up Axiis for Security Visualization</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30228</link>
		<dc:creator>System Advancements at the Monastery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Setting Up Axiis for Security Visualization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30228</guid>
		<description>[...] graphics framework, and Adobe Flex 3. Thanks to Nathan Yau for pointing this out in his post &#8220;Open Source Data Visualization Framework - Axiis.&#8221; There were also great comments to Nathan&#8217;s post, including a comparison of Axiis to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] graphics framework, and Adobe Flex 3. Thanks to Nathan Yau for pointing this out in his post &#8220;Open Source Data Visualization Framework &#8211; Axiis.&#8221; There were also great comments to Nathan&#8217;s post, including a comparison of Axiis to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30105</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30105</guid>
		<description>Here is the blog post that talks about the requirements around a radial layout and actually points to (one of the few) benefits of using a radial scale that takes advantage of the PI*r^2 distortion caused in using wedge surface areas:  
http://www.twgonzalez.com/blog/2009/03/new-visualization-stacked-wedge/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the blog post that talks about the requirements around a radial layout and actually points to (one of the few) benefits of using a radial scale that takes advantage of the PI*r^2 distortion caused in using wedge surface areas:<br />
<a href="http://www.twgonzalez.com/blog/2009/03/new-visualization-stacked-wedge/" rel="nofollow">http://www.twgonzalez.com/blog.....ked-wedge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30102</guid>
		<description>@BCC PTS Blog?  What is the URL, I always enjoy seeing critiques.   

(BTW, the impetus to build that chart was based on the clients hard requirement of seeing data in a pie format, not because it was the most efficient visual to represent that data.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BCC PTS Blog?  What is the URL, I always enjoy seeing critiques.   </p>
<p>(BTW, the impetus to build that chart was based on the clients hard requirement of seeing data in a pie format, not because it was the most efficient visual to represent that data.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCC</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30101</link>
		<dc:creator>BCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30101</guid>
		<description>Also, there&#039;s a &lt;a href=&#039;http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/whatever-25-may-2009/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;critique&lt;/a&gt; of one of the top chart on this page over at the PTS blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there&#8217;s a <a href='http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/whatever-25-may-2009/' rel="nofollow">critique</a> of one of the top chart on this page over at the PTS blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30016</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30016</guid>
		<description>@BCC, Good point, Yes please read my comments above with the disclaimer that I am a founder of the Axiis project so my views and opinions may be biased :)

FYI, The AS3 Flare (ported from the Berkely Java version) project was used as some inspiration for Axiis, it is a very solid project and people have done some incredible work with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BCC, Good point, Yes please read my comments above with the disclaimer that I am a founder of the Axiis project so my views and opinions may be biased :)</p>
<p>FYI, The AS3 Flare (ported from the Berkely Java version) project was used as some inspiration for Axiis, it is a very solid project and people have done some incredible work with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCC</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30015</link>
		<dc:creator>BCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30015</guid>
		<description>Tom,

I know your link makes it clear, but you might want to mention in your comments that you are a founder of the Axiis project.  Both as a disclaimer, and so that we can thank you for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>I know your link makes it clear, but you might want to mention in your comments that you are a founder of the Axiis project.  Both as a disclaimer, and so that we can thank you for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30010</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30010</guid>
		<description>A couple of clarifiers here.   Flex is an AS3 SDK, which allows for full OO/Procedural programming as well as application development with MXML, its markup language.   You can use either/or in Flex.  The advantage is Flex has a full GUI library in the SDK.

The biggest advantage in Flex (IMO) is that MXML supports automatic event driven binding.  So your markup can be very concise and very dynamic, allowing you to do things in a much more intuitive manner (especially for graphical content) than you would in OO/Procedural code.   Doing work work in both Processing and direct AS3, I find the markup approach to be more elegant and flexible for creating graphical assets.

Re, the difference between Axiis and Flare, is that Flare has a lot of focus on layouts and transitions, while Axiis is more focused on dynamic generation of composite/complex geometries and patterns.  Flare is also all OO/Procedural, while Axiis is primarily Markup (but does support OO/Procedural.)   Flare is also a lot more mature than Axiis.  It probably comes down to personal preference and the specifics of your project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of clarifiers here.   Flex is an AS3 SDK, which allows for full OO/Procedural programming as well as application development with MXML, its markup language.   You can use either/or in Flex.  The advantage is Flex has a full GUI library in the SDK.</p>
<p>The biggest advantage in Flex (IMO) is that MXML supports automatic event driven binding.  So your markup can be very concise and very dynamic, allowing you to do things in a much more intuitive manner (especially for graphical content) than you would in OO/Procedural code.   Doing work work in both Processing and direct AS3, I find the markup approach to be more elegant and flexible for creating graphical assets.</p>
<p>Re, the difference between Axiis and Flare, is that Flare has a lot of focus on layouts and transitions, while Axiis is more focused on dynamic generation of composite/complex geometries and patterns.  Flare is also all OO/Procedural, while Axiis is primarily Markup (but does support OO/Procedural.)   Flare is also a lot more mature than Axiis.  It probably comes down to personal preference and the specifics of your project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/05/22/open-source-data-visualization-framework-axiis/#comment-30009</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1570#comment-30009</guid>
		<description>@d^2 - flare is an actionscript 3 library, so that&#039;s a big difference. From what I hear, Flex isn&#039;t as flexible than if you were to use actionscript, but Flex does require less code. Although again, I&#039;m not a Flex user. I think it mostly comes down to a matter of preference between Flex and AS3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@d^2 &#8211; flare is an actionscript 3 library, so that&#8217;s a big difference. From what I hear, Flex isn&#8217;t as flexible than if you were to use actionscript, but Flex does require less code. Although again, I&#8217;m not a Flex user. I think it mostly comes down to a matter of preference between Flex and AS3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

