<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualize Music Collections With MusicBox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21940</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21940</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen the video yet - but from the screenshot in the post, its interesting that the data seams to follow a single dimension. I wold have thought more dimensions were needed. 
Maybe she used a varimax rotation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the video yet &#8211; but from the screenshot in the post, its interesting that the data seams to follow a single dimension. I wold have thought more dimensions were needed.<br />
Maybe she used a varimax rotation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21913</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21913</guid>
		<description>@Zack - Oh, and as for use, well, that&#039;s why I mentioned the part about being a graduate student. You get to play :). However, I could see this being useful for say, discovering new music. You might have a lot of music that you&#039;ve never heard and want to find songs that are similar to those that you like. For example, Pandora uses a similar algorithm to find songs you might like. You could imagine MusicBox as a different type of interface into Pandora Radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zack &#8211; Oh, and as for use, well, that&#8217;s why I mentioned the part about being a graduate student. You get to play :). However, I could see this being useful for say, discovering new music. You might have a lot of music that you&#8217;ve never heard and want to find songs that are similar to those that you like. For example, Pandora uses a similar algorithm to find songs you might like. You could imagine MusicBox as a different type of interface into Pandora Radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21912</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21912</guid>
		<description>@Brock - I didn&#039;t really have any statistical (legitimate) reason for saying that, but PCA seems to be a favorite among computer scientists and designers who want to reduce a multidimensional dataset.

@Zack - oops. Thanks. I&#039;m illiterate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brock &#8211; I didn&#8217;t really have any statistical (legitimate) reason for saying that, but PCA seems to be a favorite among computer scientists and designers who want to reduce a multidimensional dataset.</p>
<p>@Zack &#8211; oops. Thanks. I&#8217;m illiterate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McLaren</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21909</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McLaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21909</guid>
		<description>I like how you can see the amount of variation within each genre.  Most of the classical music is grouped really close together and the same seems true of country music.  Rock and rap on the other hand each have a wider spread which should mean there&#039;s a lot more variation in sound in those genres.

Too bad she didn&#039;t mouse over that one classical song that&#039;s off on its own in the top right.  It&#039;s got my curiosity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how you can see the amount of variation within each genre.  Most of the classical music is grouped really close together and the same seems true of country music.  Rock and rap on the other hand each have a wider spread which should mean there&#8217;s a lot more variation in sound in those genres.</p>
<p>Too bad she didn&#8217;t mouse over that one classical song that&#8217;s off on its own in the top right.  It&#8217;s got my curiosity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21906</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21906</guid>
		<description>It would appear, based on the legend in the bottom left, that &#039;Rap&#039; music is furthest to the left in red, while &#039;Rock&#039; music sits at the mid-range level in cyan.

And this idea is fun, random data made aesthetically pleasing. I&#039;ve go to ask though, what would you use this information for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear, based on the legend in the bottom left, that &#8216;Rap&#8217; music is furthest to the left in red, while &#8216;Rock&#8217; music sits at the mid-range level in cyan.</p>
<p>And this idea is fun, random data made aesthetically pleasing. I&#8217;ve go to ask though, what would you use this information for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/12/18/visualize-music-collections-with-musicbox/#comment-21902</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1244#comment-21902</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan,

Just a question (mostly to test my knowledge), but what do you feel its obvious that she used principal components.  From my understanding, that technique simply rearranges the variance in a system.  My approach would have been to decompose the variance into factors and cluster the songs on the factors.

Like I said, interested in hearing your thoughts.  I am not a PhD, just a data dork.  

Thanks for your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan,</p>
<p>Just a question (mostly to test my knowledge), but what do you feel its obvious that she used principal components.  From my understanding, that technique simply rearranges the variance in a system.  My approach would have been to decompose the variance into factors and cluster the songs on the factors.</p>
<p>Like I said, interested in hearing your thoughts.  I am not a PhD, just a data dork.  </p>
<p>Thanks for your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

