<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Map Shows Newspaper Endorsements in US Presidential Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ::: Think Macro ::: Â» Reading blogs #4</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/#comment-17392</link>
		<dc:creator>::: Think Macro ::: Â» Reading blogs #4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1098#comment-17392</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Map Shows Newspaper Endorsements in US Presidential Election&#8221; - I think the title speaks for itself; interesting take on things.Â  And here is a - &#8220;Cool New Political Video Barometer&#8221; - which also has examples of some popular viral videos on both sides of political map.Â  BTW, Henry Jenkins in his post argues against the term &#8220;viral media&#8221; in favor of &#8220;spreadable media&#8221; - what do you think? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Map Shows Newspaper Endorsements in US Presidential Election&#8221; &#8211; I think the title speaks for itself; interesting take on things.Â  And here is a &#8211; &#8220;Cool New Political Video Barometer&#8221; &#8211; which also has examples of some popular viral videos on both sides of political map.Â  BTW, Henry Jenkins in his post argues against the term &#8220;viral media&#8221; in favor of &#8220;spreadable media&#8221; &#8211; what do you think? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/#comment-17128</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1098#comment-17128</guid>
		<description>@Bryan - reporting just news and facts? ridiculous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bryan &#8211; reporting just news and facts? ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/#comment-17107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1098#comment-17107</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be cool if all the newspapers were reporting news instead of choosing sides and skewing information to endorse a particular POV?
Of course, that wouldn&#039;t make for a very interesting map... just a bunch of grey circles. Hmmm... but then people would be forced to THINK about the issues themselves and make a truly &#039;informed&#039; choice about X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be cool if all the newspapers were reporting news instead of choosing sides and skewing information to endorse a particular POV?<br />
Of course, that wouldn&#8217;t make for a very interesting map&#8230; just a bunch of grey circles. Hmmm&#8230; but then people would be forced to THINK about the issues themselves and make a truly &#8216;informed&#8217; choice about X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/#comment-17101</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1098#comment-17101</guid>
		<description>@Reader - No. Circles with a gradient fill don&#039;t have a border.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Reader &#8211; No. Circles with a gradient fill don&#8217;t have a border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/29/map-shows-newspaper-endorsements-in-us-presidential-election/#comment-17099</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1098#comment-17099</guid>
		<description>Huh? Your explanation isn&#039;t correct. The circles with a gradient/border are the ones that flipped parties between 2004 and 2008; the lighter circles are the ones that endorsed the same party across the elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Your explanation isn&#8217;t correct. The circles with a gradient/border are the ones that flipped parties between 2004 and 2008; the lighter circles are the ones that endorsed the same party across the elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

