<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playboy Playmate Curves and the State of the Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:29:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: When the economy goes south curvy women become more attractive to men &#171; Lip service</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-26680</link>
		<dc:creator>When the economy goes south curvy women become more attractive to men &#171; Lip service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-26680</guid>
		<description>[...] Playboy Playmate Curves and the State of the Economy &#124; Flowing Data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Playboy Playmate Curves and the State of the Economy | Flowing Data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ComparisonMatrix component&#8230; or Playboy Playmates and the Economy</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-22456</link>
		<dc:creator>The ComparisonMatrix component&#8230; or Playboy Playmates and the Economy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-22456</guid>
		<description>[...] playmates of the year and the economy.Â  I grabbed the csv for the playmate data off of Flowing Data, added a few fields to it, and dropped it into a ComparisonMatrix (view source enabled).Â  Pink [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] playmates of the year and the economy.Â  I grabbed the csv for the playmate data off of Flowing Data, added a few fields to it, and dropped it into a ComparisonMatrix (view source enabled).Â  Pink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuurtje? &#124; Attuworld Nederland</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-17705</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuurtje? &#124; Attuworld Nederland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-17705</guid>
		<description>[...] sells, zeker in economisch zware tijden. Onlangs toonden wetenschappers al aan dat de borstmaten in de Playboy groter worden, naarmate de economische tijden zwaarder [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sells, zeker in economisch zware tijden. Onlangs toonden wetenschappers al aan dat de borstmaten in de Playboy groter worden, naarmate de economische tijden zwaarder [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorieten en bookmarks voor 23 October tot 5 November &#124; Cafe del Marketing</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-17612</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorieten en bookmarks voor 23 October tot 5 November &#124; Cafe del Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-17612</guid>
		<description>[...] Playboy Playmate Curves and the State of the Economy - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Playboy Playmate Curves and the State of the Economy &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-17015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-17015</guid>
		<description>Nathan -

I&#039;d say, not that skinny and the implants are probably reasonable, at least in a conservative publication like Playboy. It&#039;s probably more likely that the so-called statistics overstate height and understate weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan -</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say, not that skinny and the implants are probably reasonable, at least in a conservative publication like Playboy. It&#8217;s probably more likely that the so-called statistics overstate height and understate weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-17000</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-17000</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s probably worth remembering that playmates tend to be very skinny girls with very large implants</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s probably worth remembering that playmates tend to be very skinny girls with very large implants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>I once came across a website that had full-length photos of a large number of people, along with their BMI. My guess is that a woman with a BMI of 18 (which looks to be the average here, at least according to the given data) would not be centerfold material. The NIH classifies that as &quot;underweight&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once came across a website that had full-length photos of a large number of people, along with their BMI. My guess is that a woman with a BMI of 18 (which looks to be the average here, at least according to the given data) would not be centerfold material. The NIH classifies that as &#8220;underweight&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Clare</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-16985</link>
		<dc:creator>David Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-16985</guid>
		<description>The weights reported for centerfold models don&#039;t jive with my experience.   Off the top of my head, I recall reading a recent one where she listed height at 5&#039;4&quot;, weight at ~108, with 36DD.  The problem is that the rest of her body looked normal.  Legs, rear end, etc, all pretty normal.

That combination doesn&#039;t work in my experience.  At that height, with the pictured figure, a woman should be about 125.  The women I have been with that tipped in under 110, were _slender_.  A/B cups at that height.   The only DD I ever knew under 100 lbs was 4&#039;11&quot;

Interesting graphs, but the story they tell may not be exactly what you think you are trying to say.

(BTW, I do have a PhD in engineering, not to brag, just to reinforce that I am pretty skeptical in general, and really skeptical about women&#039;s claims with respect to their figures.  The reported data never really squares with my experience ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weights reported for centerfold models don&#8217;t jive with my experience.   Off the top of my head, I recall reading a recent one where she listed height at 5&#8242;4&#8243;, weight at ~108, with 36DD.  The problem is that the rest of her body looked normal.  Legs, rear end, etc, all pretty normal.</p>
<p>That combination doesn&#8217;t work in my experience.  At that height, with the pictured figure, a woman should be about 125.  The women I have been with that tipped in under 110, were _slender_.  A/B cups at that height.   The only DD I ever knew under 100 lbs was 4&#8242;11&#8243;</p>
<p>Interesting graphs, but the story they tell may not be exactly what you think you are trying to say.</p>
<p>(BTW, I do have a PhD in engineering, not to brag, just to reinforce that I am pretty skeptical in general, and really skeptical about women&#8217;s claims with respect to their figures.  The reported data never really squares with my experience ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip (flip) Kromer</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-16917</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip (flip) Kromer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-16917</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a strong outlier, Carmella DeCesare, on the waist/hips ratio.
Her line is given as
  &quot;2004&quot;,&quot; Carmella DeCesare&quot;,21,34,24,27,68,118
On wikipedia, her hips are given as 34&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a strong outlier, Carmella DeCesare, on the waist/hips ratio.<br />
Her line is given as<br />
  &#8220;2004&#8243;,&#8221; Carmella DeCesare&#8221;,21,34,24,27,68,118<br />
On wikipedia, her hips are given as 34&#8243;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/24/playboy-playmate-curves-and-the-state-of-the-economy/#comment-16907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1076#comment-16907</guid>
		<description>I meant to add, like most academic papers, they managed to make their topic rather boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to add, like most academic papers, they managed to make their topic rather boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
