<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sketching Around Personal Brand Tracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:18:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel JimÃ©nez</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-15041</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel JimÃ©nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-15041</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your comments and to Nathan for publishin the article. The sketch is in a realy early stage, so the sources of data are not clear. 

@Trace and @Danes i think the main points of tracking should be around thinks that already track you like technorati &amp; feedburner, plus your content producers: twitter and rss... i knew there&#039;s a lot of reactions missing here, that&#039;s the reason why google is include: it obviusly will reflect reactions included in the previous systems, but also include a much broader vision of the activity around your content. I don&#039;t know if this should change when adding new trackers (let&#039;s say jaiku, or wikipedia), but for sure google will provide a broader search.

@Scott the main inner circle is reflecting the 100% of the activity around you... so if most of the content is tracked through technorati, that section will be bigger, representing it actual value. anyway your idea is really nice, focusing on colours to reflect previous states.

@Bram thanks a lot for your comments, is good to see that this can go up as anything useful to people. the idea was, as you said, to minimize the time of gathering all the information by ourselves, and let the information play new roles on the intersection points between the data collected.

@Joe definitely it looks like Simon :) maybe with more service tracking inside the inner circle it can look different. I have another version of this sketch in plain stats, without applying polar coordinates transformations around the main graphs.

Thanks you all for your comments, it&#039;s really nice to see that FlowingData followers are so interested...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your comments and to Nathan for publishin the article. The sketch is in a realy early stage, so the sources of data are not clear. </p>
<p>@Trace and @Danes i think the main points of tracking should be around thinks that already track you like technorati &amp; feedburner, plus your content producers: twitter and rss&#8230; i knew there&#8217;s a lot of reactions missing here, that&#8217;s the reason why google is include: it obviusly will reflect reactions included in the previous systems, but also include a much broader vision of the activity around your content. I don&#8217;t know if this should change when adding new trackers (let&#8217;s say jaiku, or wikipedia), but for sure google will provide a broader search.</p>
<p>@Scott the main inner circle is reflecting the 100% of the activity around you&#8230; so if most of the content is tracked through technorati, that section will be bigger, representing it actual value. anyway your idea is really nice, focusing on colours to reflect previous states.</p>
<p>@Bram thanks a lot for your comments, is good to see that this can go up as anything useful to people. the idea was, as you said, to minimize the time of gathering all the information by ourselves, and let the information play new roles on the intersection points between the data collected.</p>
<p>@Joe definitely it looks like Simon :) maybe with more service tracking inside the inner circle it can look different. I have another version of this sketch in plain stats, without applying polar coordinates transformations around the main graphs.</p>
<p>Thanks you all for your comments, it&#8217;s really nice to see that FlowingData followers are so interested&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace Cohen</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-15038</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 07:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-15038</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dan on this one, if by Google you mean all the social networks you can join then yes it works. You cant Ego Search yourself if you dont put yourself out there.

Blogs are one of the strongest tools on the web for anyone looking to create an online presence. They are easy to create and are only limited by your determination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dan on this one, if by Google you mean all the social networks you can join then yes it works. You cant Ego Search yourself if you dont put yourself out there.</p>
<p>Blogs are one of the strongest tools on the web for anyone looking to create an online presence. They are easy to create and are only limited by your determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-15019</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-15019</guid>
		<description>@Bram - i wish i could accept the praise, but this is actually Miguel&#039;s guest post (as said in the first line in italics). I am sure he is reading though and appreciates it :)

Don&#039;t forget to check out Miguel&#039;s UX blog:

http://www.migueljimenez.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bram &#8211; i wish i could accept the praise, but this is actually Miguel&#8217;s guest post (as said in the first line in italics). I am sure he is reading though and appreciates it :)</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to check out Miguel&#8217;s UX blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.migueljimenez.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.migueljimenez.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram Pitoyo</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-15017</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram Pitoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-15017</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

Your visualization is an interesting way to display social media monitoring. I use Intelligence Feed, a combination of aggregated and filtered RSS stream (think Yahoo!Pipes, MagpieRSS, AideRSS and Dapper), to get a bird&#039;s eye view of both my personal profile and brands I manage. Right now, though, theyâ€™re only displayed through Netvibes in a manner much less dynamic than yours (ie. http://netvibes.com/refresh)

Tracking these data is worth the effort, though, because by aggregating and filtering data, we reduce the time that it takes to manage our online presence. For instance, I can easily see relevant blog posts, and tweet it for my followers to see and talk about. This is because I can see all these data in one environment, without needing to switch between, for instance, a Twitter client and RSS reader.

I particularly love your notion of â€˜innerâ€™ and â€˜outer circles,â€™ and visualizing how our presence makes an impact on the internet.

However, most of the efforts so far have been centered around gathering and filtering through external, third-party service (Technorati, and services I wrote above.) Iâ€™m interested in studying ways in which we can, like you said, â€œlook for intersection points within.â€

Thanks for writing an amazing article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>Your visualization is an interesting way to display social media monitoring. I use Intelligence Feed, a combination of aggregated and filtered RSS stream (think Yahoo!Pipes, MagpieRSS, AideRSS and Dapper), to get a bird&#8217;s eye view of both my personal profile and brands I manage. Right now, though, theyâ€™re only displayed through Netvibes in a manner much less dynamic than yours (ie. <a href="http://netvibes.com/refresh)" rel="nofollow">http://netvibes.com/refresh)</a></p>
<p>Tracking these data is worth the effort, though, because by aggregating and filtering data, we reduce the time that it takes to manage our online presence. For instance, I can easily see relevant blog posts, and tweet it for my followers to see and talk about. This is because I can see all these data in one environment, without needing to switch between, for instance, a Twitter client and RSS reader.</p>
<p>I particularly love your notion of â€˜innerâ€™ and â€˜outer circles,â€™ and visualizing how our presence makes an impact on the internet.</p>
<p>However, most of the efforts so far have been centered around gathering and filtering through external, third-party service (Technorati, and services I wrote above.) Iâ€™m interested in studying ways in which we can, like you said, â€œlook for intersection points within.â€</p>
<p>Thanks for writing an amazing article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Frey</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-15001</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-15001</guid>
		<description>I really how you have adapted the idea of a doughnut chart here. You could have the hue of each category reflect growth/change in each area, although that only addresses magnitude. You would have to have color changes indicating whether influence is waxing or waning in a given area. However, you could accomplish both if you allowed that data to be expressed in the size of the wedges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really how you have adapted the idea of a doughnut chart here. You could have the hue of each category reflect growth/change in each area, although that only addresses magnitude. You would have to have color changes indicating whether influence is waxing or waning in a given area. However, you could accomplish both if you allowed that data to be expressed in the size of the wedges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schawbel</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-14985</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schawbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-14985</guid>
		<description>I like where you are going with this post, but feel the diagram is too limiting.  There are more ways to get your message out than the 4 you listed in your diagram.  If you meant that Google included blogs, articles, wiki&#039;s, social networks, then it might make sense.  &quot;Google&quot; is so broad that it can cover all 4 if you know what I mean.

I like the post and your thinking though.  This is just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like where you are going with this post, but feel the diagram is too limiting.  There are more ways to get your message out than the 4 you listed in your diagram.  If you meant that Google included blogs, articles, wiki&#8217;s, social networks, then it might make sense.  &#8220;Google&#8221; is so broad that it can cover all 4 if you know what I mean.</p>
<p>I like the post and your thinking though.  This is just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose luis latorre</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-14982</link>
		<dc:creator>jose luis latorre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-14982</guid>
		<description>interesting mesh, hope to see it live in2 short!!
As for a suggestion, add a timeline view that it
 is able to be animated and show progress visually...
of course it would require to save the data and develop 
a layer for this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting mesh, hope to see it live in2 short!!<br />
As for a suggestion, add a timeline view that it<br />
 is able to be animated and show progress visually&#8230;<br />
of course it would require to save the data and develop<br />
a layer for this :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/10/03/sketching-around-personal-brand-tracking/#comment-14981</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=1047#comment-14981</guid>
		<description>It reminds me too much of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_(game)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Simon&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me too much of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_(game)" rel="nofollow">Simon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
