<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shouldn&#8217;t You Be Using Firefox By Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:11:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-11825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-11825</guid>
		<description>Never had a problem with IE, not once.  I guess its the sites I got to.   I dont know.  I dont know anyone else who&#039;s had a problem other than news reports - but then I dont believe a thing I hear in the news unless it has a video and even then....

Having said that, I use FF and probably 80% of the time.  Its nice, I like it and like the customizations I can add to it.  But I never had a problem with IE and I really dont know what all these reports of problems are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never had a problem with IE, not once.  I guess its the sites I got to.   I dont know.  I dont know anyone else who&#8217;s had a problem other than news reports &#8211; but then I dont believe a thing I hear in the news unless it has a video and even then&#8230;.</p>
<p>Having said that, I use FF and probably 80% of the time.  Its nice, I like it and like the customizations I can add to it.  But I never had a problem with IE and I really dont know what all these reports of problems are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intense Minimalism &#8226; Infografica: Sicurezza, Firefox vs Explorer</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-11416</link>
		<dc:creator>Intense Minimalism &#8226; Infografica: Sicurezza, Firefox vs Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-11416</guid>
		<description>[...] piuttosto significativa sui periodi di vulnerabilitÃ  effettiva dei due browser nel 2006. [via FlowingData, source by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] piuttosto significativa sui periodi di vulnerabilitÃ  effettiva dei due browser nel 2006. [via FlowingData, source by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-10579</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-10579</guid>
		<description>huh, looks like there was an oversight with december. someone accidentally put three extra squares at the beginning. i think the rest of the calendars are accurate to the 2006 year though.

Random could be a good choice, but the difference wouldn&#039;t look as dramatic even though the same number of squares are filled in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh, looks like there was an oversight with december. someone accidentally put three extra squares at the beginning. i think the rest of the calendars are accurate to the 2006 year though.</p>
<p>Random could be a good choice, but the difference wouldn&#8217;t look as dramatic even though the same number of squares are filled in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-10533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-10533</guid>
		<description>The calendar graph seems to suggest there are no threats in November and December, even for IE.  Wouldn&#039;t it be better to  pick the dots at random ? It also suggests December had 34 days that year. Why not us a more realistic calendar ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The calendar graph seems to suggest there are no threats in November and December, even for IE.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to  pick the dots at random ? It also suggests December had 34 days that year. Why not us a more realistic calendar ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-10396</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-10396</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s weird, although i think i&#039;ve heard of that problem before. personally, i never had that trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s weird, although i think i&#8217;ve heard of that problem before. personally, i never had that trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoingLikeSixty</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/07/22/shouldnt-you-be-using-firefox-by-now/#comment-10321</link>
		<dc:creator>GoingLikeSixty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/?p=853#comment-10321</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d like to use Firefox exclusively, but the fonts render poorly, and using Google RSS, I keep getting an error message. I have disabled all add-ons with no success. It&#039;s so bad that I can&#039;t scroll thru a dozen feeds without getting the &quot;oops...&quot; message.

So I&#039;m bi-browser: Safari when I want to read RSS, and Firefox for the heavy lifting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d like to use Firefox exclusively, but the fonts render poorly, and using Google RSS, I keep getting an error message. I have disabled all add-ons with no success. It&#8217;s so bad that I can&#8217;t scroll thru a dozen feeds without getting the &#8220;oops&#8230;&#8221; message.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m bi-browser: Safari when I want to read RSS, and Firefox for the heavy lifting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
