<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Little Bit of Design Goes a Long Way With Infographics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Find Your Dream Home (or Fantasize) With Trulia Snapshot &#124; FlowingData</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>Find Your Dream Home (or Fantasize) With Trulia Snapshot &#124; FlowingData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>[...] images blur as you whiz by. It&#039;s a very small part and not the focal point, but it&#039;s one of those little design things that make it that much better. Nice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] images blur as you whiz by. It&#8217;s a very small part and not the focal point, but it&#8217;s one of those little design things that make it that much better. Nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolling Out Your Own Online Maps and Graphs with HTML/CSS &#124; FlowingData</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolling Out Your Own Online Maps and Graphs with HTML/CSS &#124; FlowingData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember: a little bit of design goes a long way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember: a little bit of design goes a long way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50081</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50081</guid>
		<description>One other non-trivial change was made: the redesign uses only lower case. I find that a bit more restful. The change in case may have been facilitated by the change in frequency scale, since the greater variety of sizes helps isolate individual color names while in the original the initial caps were more critical for that isolation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other non-trivial change was made: the redesign uses only lower case. I find that a bit more restful. The change in case may have been facilitated by the change in frequency scale, since the greater variety of sizes helps isolate individual color names while in the original the initial caps were more critical for that isolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Schneider</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-3123</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-3123</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s completely straightforward, Nate. 
&quot;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#039;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&quot;

In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?

In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.

That said, I&#039;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. 

It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#039;art&#039;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?

I&#039;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#039;d see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s completely straightforward, Nate.<br />
&#8220;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#8217;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?</p>
<p>In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. </p>
<p>It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#8216;art&#8217;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#8217;d see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Schneider</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50078</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s completely straightforward, Nate. 
&quot;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#039;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&quot;

In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?

In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.

That said, I&#039;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. 

It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#039;art&#039;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?

I&#039;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#039;d see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s completely straightforward, Nate.<br />
&#8220;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#8217;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?</p>
<p>In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. </p>
<p>It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#8216;art&#8217;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#8217;d see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Schneider</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50079</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s completely straightforward, Nate. 
&quot;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#039;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&quot;

In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?

In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.

That said, I&#039;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. 

It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#039;art&#039;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?

I&#039;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#039;d see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s completely straightforward, Nate.<br />
&#8220;The original is kind of nice to look at and under close inspection, even provides some interesting tidbits. In the redesign, it&#8217;s pretty clear how color was selected and looks a good bit prettier.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the redesign, what stands out are the NAMES of the colors of the rainbow, rather than the alternate names. So while it stresses that people know the rainbow colors, nothing more subtle is obvious (to me). Where are the colors between blue and purple in the redesign? Maybe the background color is washing them out? Or is that the scaling?</p>
<p>In the original, I see a color wheel, and I can pick out individual names.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d much rather look at the redesign, from an aesthetic perspective. </p>
<p>It takes care to distinguish art from beautiful-with-meaning. I think the redesign leans to &#8216;art&#8217;, losing some meaning. Any sense in that to you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more redesigns of this image, exaggerating various features. I wonder what we&#8217;d see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networking the rainbow &#171; The Arbitrarian</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Networking the rainbow &#171; The Arbitrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>[...] soul cleaned up the data. A Mr. Wattenburg took the first shot at aesthetic presentation, and as FlowingData has noted, his version is an improvement. Neoformix produced an even more kicked-up version. Thus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] soul cleaned up the data. A Mr. Wattenburg took the first shot at aesthetic presentation, and as FlowingData has noted, his version is an improvement. Neoformix produced an even more kicked-up version. Thus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50077</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50077</guid>
		<description>This is very cool.  Being color-blind, I am sure I see this differently than most others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very cool.  Being color-blind, I am sure I see this differently than most others!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTV</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>CTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see this done solely on colorblind subjects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see this done solely on colorblind subjects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTV</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50075</link>
		<dc:creator>CTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/27/a-little-bit-of-design-goes-a-long-way-with-infographics/#comment-50075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see this done solely on colorblind subjects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see this done solely on colorblind subjects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

