<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Security Upgrade Rendered Useless &#8211; Private Photos Leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/</link>
	<description>Strength in Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50055</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50055</guid>
		<description>The biggest privacy concern that people don&#039;t seem to be aware of are Facebook&#039;s public search results. If you Google for a person&#039;s name, their &quot;public profile&quot; may be indexed. It just shows you their profile pic, their name and some of their friends. Most people still allow Google to index the fact that they have a Facebook profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest privacy concern that people don&#8217;t seem to be aware of are Facebook&#8217;s public search results. If you Google for a person&#8217;s name, their &#8220;public profile&#8221; may be indexed. It just shows you their profile pic, their name and some of their friends. Most people still allow Google to index the fact that they have a Facebook profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>@Nathan:

What you really should have said was &quot;I&#039;ve never had problems with Facebook... that I was aware of&quot;.  A simple Google, using &quot;facebook+privacy&quot; should give you lots of hits on the subject.

It&#039;s not surprising there&#039;s lots of people unaware of this.  It&#039;s because the issue lies in activity that&#039;s not apparent to the user.   All the data mining and sharing of that info goes on out of your sight.  And, a lot of the time, people &quot;automatically&quot; seem to trust sites like Facebook.  They don&#039;t expect Facebook to be doing this kind of thing, but Facebook has admitted to it, and doesn&#039;t seem to be offering any kind of real apology for that.

It&#039;s even been proven that Facebook&#039;s &quot;partners&quot;:
1) plant tracking cookies directly on users&#039; computers
2) even when users have OPTED OUT, this happens
3) tracking users takes place even when they&#039;re LOGGED OFF of Facebook.
4) If you block the cookies, you will not be able to use Facebook.

As far as my experience goes, I guess I am a veteran.
Pretty much my entire career has been built on computers, and started before they even had hard drives.  (Man!  I suddenly feel OLD!)

: )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan:</p>
<p>What you really should have said was &#8220;I&#8217;ve never had problems with Facebook&#8230; that I was aware of&#8221;.  A simple Google, using &#8220;facebook+privacy&#8221; should give you lots of hits on the subject.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising there&#8217;s lots of people unaware of this.  It&#8217;s because the issue lies in activity that&#8217;s not apparent to the user.   All the data mining and sharing of that info goes on out of your sight.  And, a lot of the time, people &#8220;automatically&#8221; seem to trust sites like Facebook.  They don&#8217;t expect Facebook to be doing this kind of thing, but Facebook has admitted to it, and doesn&#8217;t seem to be offering any kind of real apology for that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s even been proven that Facebook&#8217;s &#8220;partners&#8221;:<br />
1) plant tracking cookies directly on users&#8217; computers<br />
2) even when users have OPTED OUT, this happens<br />
3) tracking users takes place even when they&#8217;re LOGGED OFF of Facebook.<br />
4) If you block the cookies, you will not be able to use Facebook.</p>
<p>As far as my experience goes, I guess I am a veteran.<br />
Pretty much my entire career has been built on computers, and started before they even had hard drives.  (Man!  I suddenly feel OLD!)</p>
<p>: )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50054</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50054</guid>
		<description>@Nathan:

What you really should have said was &quot;I&#039;ve never had problems with Facebook... that I was aware of&quot;.  A simple Google, using &quot;facebook+privacy&quot; should give you lots of hits on the subject.

It&#039;s not surprising there&#039;s lots of people unaware of this.  It&#039;s because the issue lies in activity that&#039;s not apparent to the user.   All the data mining and sharing of that info goes on out of your sight.  And, a lot of the time, people &quot;automatically&quot; seem to trust sites like Facebook.  They don&#039;t expect Facebook to be doing this kind of thing, but Facebook has admitted to it, and doesn&#039;t seem to be offering any kind of real apology for that.

It&#039;s even been proven that Facebook&#039;s &quot;partners&quot;:
1) plant tracking cookies directly on users&#039; computers
2) even when users have OPTED OUT, this happens
3) tracking users takes place even when they&#039;re LOGGED OFF of Facebook.
4) If you block the cookies, you will not be able to use Facebook.

As far as my experience goes, I guess I am a veteran.
Pretty much my entire career has been built on computers, and started before they even had hard drives.  (Man!  I suddenly feel OLD!)

: )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan:</p>
<p>What you really should have said was &#8220;I&#8217;ve never had problems with Facebook&#8230; that I was aware of&#8221;.  A simple Google, using &#8220;facebook+privacy&#8221; should give you lots of hits on the subject.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising there&#8217;s lots of people unaware of this.  It&#8217;s because the issue lies in activity that&#8217;s not apparent to the user.   All the data mining and sharing of that info goes on out of your sight.  And, a lot of the time, people &#8220;automatically&#8221; seem to trust sites like Facebook.  They don&#8217;t expect Facebook to be doing this kind of thing, but Facebook has admitted to it, and doesn&#8217;t seem to be offering any kind of real apology for that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s even been proven that Facebook&#8217;s &#8220;partners&#8221;:<br />
1) plant tracking cookies directly on users&#8217; computers<br />
2) even when users have OPTED OUT, this happens<br />
3) tracking users takes place even when they&#8217;re LOGGED OFF of Facebook.<br />
4) If you block the cookies, you will not be able to use Facebook.</p>
<p>As far as my experience goes, I guess I am a veteran.<br />
Pretty much my entire career has been built on computers, and started before they even had hard drives.  (Man!  I suddenly feel OLD!)</p>
<p>: )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50053</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50053</guid>
		<description>@DA: Wow, you sound like someone speaking from experience. I mostly only speak from experience... Personally, I&#039;ve never had any problems with facebook and I haven&#039;t heard anything bad from my friends. That last point though - I agree with you on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DA: Wow, you sound like someone speaking from experience. I mostly only speak from experience&#8230; Personally, I&#8217;ve never had any problems with facebook and I haven&#8217;t heard anything bad from my friends. That last point though &#8211; I agree with you on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Facebook&#039;s excellent reputation...&quot;
???????????!

Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#039;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.

Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.

This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &quot;goldmine&quot; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#039;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.

Sure, they&#039;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.

The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#039; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#039; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.

And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)

Another interesting thing people don&#039;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#039;s property - the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.

There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!

It doesn&#039;t matter what internet activity you engage in - YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#039;s hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Facebook&#8217;s excellent reputation&#8230;&#8221;<br />
???????????!</p>
<p>Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#8217;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.</p>
<p>Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.</p>
<p>This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &#8220;goldmine&#8221; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#8217;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.</p>
<p>Sure, they&#8217;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.</p>
<p>The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#8217; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#8217; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.</p>
<p>And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)</p>
<p>Another interesting thing people don&#8217;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#8217;s property &#8211; the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.</p>
<p>There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what internet activity you engage in &#8211; YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#8217;s hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50050</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50050</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Facebook&#039;s excellent reputation...&quot;
???????????!

Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#039;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.

Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.

This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &quot;goldmine&quot; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#039;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.

Sure, they&#039;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.

The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#039; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#039; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.

And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)

Another interesting thing people don&#039;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#039;s property - the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.

There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!

It doesn&#039;t matter what internet activity you engage in - YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#039;s hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Facebook&#8217;s excellent reputation&#8230;&#8221;<br />
???????????!</p>
<p>Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#8217;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.</p>
<p>Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.</p>
<p>This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &#8220;goldmine&#8221; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#8217;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.</p>
<p>Sure, they&#8217;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.</p>
<p>The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#8217; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#8217; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.</p>
<p>And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)</p>
<p>Another interesting thing people don&#8217;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#8217;s property &#8211; the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.</p>
<p>There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what internet activity you engage in &#8211; YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#8217;s hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50051</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50051</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Facebook&#039;s excellent reputation...&quot;
???????????!

Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#039;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.

Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.

This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &quot;goldmine&quot; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#039;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.

Sure, they&#039;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.

The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#039; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#039; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.

And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)

Another interesting thing people don&#039;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#039;s property - the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.

There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!

It doesn&#039;t matter what internet activity you engage in - YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#039;s hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Facebook&#8217;s excellent reputation&#8230;&#8221;<br />
???????????!</p>
<p>Where did anyone get the idea Facebook ever had such a good rep??  Facebook&#8217;s privacy issues, as well as their failure to listen (and slowness to react) to the complaints, has been a well-known thing for some time.</p>
<p>Even when the finally got the message on some of it, they still seem to have a problem with giving the users the actual control over the interactions their pages are subjected to.</p>
<p>This is because Facebook is struggling to find that &#8220;goldmine&#8221; of advertising cash that always seems to depend on NOT protecting privacy.  Their own reluctance to admit they can&#8217;t have it both ways blinds them to some of the obvious solutions to the complaints.</p>
<p>Sure, they&#8217;ve introduced new options, etc. over the last while.  But, they continue to hold back the idea of a simple, straightforward and honest transfer of control.  Facebook has shown it fully intends to reserve its (self-perceived and wrongful) right to gather your info and share it with those advertisers who can promise them a buck.</p>
<p>The fact that Facebook has been allowing 3rd parties to upload content DIRECTLY to the users&#8217; pages (thereby placing stuff on individuals&#8217; hard drives), without prior consent, and still continues to do so (regardless of what the users have opted in or out of), should tell everyone a story right there.</p>
<p>And, Facebook makes frequent changes to its posted policies without surveying user opinions, and without alerting the users to the changes.  (If you take the time to read some of them very carefully, you may even get concerned enough to remove your profile!)</p>
<p>Another interesting thing people don&#8217;t seem to think about is the fact that all websites are subject to be bought and sold anyway.  When that happens, all the data becomes someone else&#8217;s property &#8211; the new owner will do whatever it wants with it.</p>
<p>There will probably come a day when Facebook gets bought.  Do you still think privacy is even possible?!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what internet activity you engage in &#8211; YOU are ultimately to blame for what you choose to upload.  Only share what you can guarantee will not create a problem for you in someone else&#8217;s hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cody</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50048</link>
		<dc:creator>cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50048</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I&#039;m a bit pessimistic on this front, but I mostly observe the following rule:  

If you don&#039;t want a particular set of people to have &#039;it&#039;, then don&#039;t place &#039;it&#039; online at all.

History tells us that localized security measures often fail, and company promises of privacy or protection from abuse often fall by the wayside in the name of convenience and progress.

Flowing data indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m a bit pessimistic on this front, but I mostly observe the following rule:  </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want a particular set of people to have &#8216;it&#8217;, then don&#8217;t place &#8216;it&#8217; online at all.</p>
<p>History tells us that localized security measures often fail, and company promises of privacy or protection from abuse often fall by the wayside in the name of convenience and progress.</p>
<p>Flowing data indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yau</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50046</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50046</guid>
		<description>Definitely. I&#039;m positive that this won&#039;t in any way affect how much time I spend i.e. waste on Facebook. It&#039;s still a great social application, and it&#039;ll certainly get past this blip in the road and will probably end up better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely. I&#8217;m positive that this won&#8217;t in any way affect how much time I spend i.e. waste on Facebook. It&#8217;s still a great social application, and it&#8217;ll certainly get past this blip in the road and will probably end up better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flowingdata.com/2008/03/25/facebook-security-upgrade-rendered-useless-private-photos-leaked/#comment-50045</guid>
		<description>I am thrilled with Facebook&#039;s new privacy settings (I know, this is off topic LOL). It is actually very important those of us that are TAs. I don&#039;t add any of my students, but some of them have added me. By adding them to my &quot;Students&quot; friend list, I can hide all of those blackout pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thrilled with Facebook&#8217;s new privacy settings (I know, this is off topic LOL). It is actually very important those of us that are TAs. I don&#8217;t add any of my students, but some of them have added me. By adding them to my &#8220;Students&#8221; friend list, I can hide all of those blackout pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

